The BLM riots and the overwhelming cheerleading that took place from Liberals during these events, alongside the enduring mania to defund and dishonor our police, has led to increased crime across the board. Add to this the weaponization of America’s courts by the Left, and we find ourselves unsurprisingly in an America without social restraint. New ideas are needed.
Topics
Ted Cruz and Mike Lee Support Eastman: A Reader’s Guide to Their Amicus Brief
Senators Cruz and Lee argue that disputed legal advocacy deserves First Amendment protection and that clients need access to independent counsel.
MacIver Institute Supports Eastman: A Reader’s Guide to Its Amicus Brief
The MacIver Institute argues that California exceeded its authority by adjudicating a federal crime against Congress.
The Oversight Project Supports Eastman
The Oversight Project challenges Eastman’s disbarment on federal jurisdiction, presidential clemency, free speech, and due process grounds.
Strossen, Roiphe, and Volokh Support Eastman: A Reader’s Guide
Nadine Strossen, Rebecca Roiphe, and Eugene Volokh argue that lawyers retain First Amendment protection for public political speech.
Posts
Life Legal Defense Foundation Supports Eastman: A Reader’s Guide to Its Amicus Brief
Life Legal argues for stronger protection of political speech and legal advice, and warns against deterring lawyers from representing unpopular clients.
Article III Project Supports Eastman: A Reader’s Guide
A guide to Article III Project’s brief on ideological tests for bar membership, Eastman’s disciplinary record, and independent legal advocacy.
Liberty Legal Foundation and Others Support Eastman
A guide to the October 5 amicus brief supporting John Eastman: attorney speech, fair notice, and clients’ access to independent counsel.
Seventeen Current and Former Trump Attorneys Support Eastman
Seventeen attorneys argue that political advocacy groups compromised the independence of bar disciplinary proceedings.
APA Watch Supports Eastman: A Reader’s Guide
APA Watch argues that California’s discipline burdens lawyers and clients, misuses the federal conspiracy statute, and conflicts with federal authority over litigation.
Goldstein and Henry Support Review of Eastman’s Case
Two Pennsylvania election lawyers distinguish their support for Supreme Court review from endorsement of Eastman, arguing that disputed advocacy needs a clear disciplinary standard.
NLPC and Four Attorneys Support Eastman
NLPC and four attorneys argue that allegations of falsity or criminal conduct do not let California bypass the First Amendment standard for speech-based discipline.
America’s Future and Others Support Eastman
Thirteen organizations argue that California’s treatment of election challenges, a disputed federal filing, and political advocacy warrants Supreme Court review.
John Eastman’s Supreme Court Petition: A Reader’s Guide
Three questions about attorney speech, constitutional advocacy, and state discipline—plus a searchable guide to Eastman’s Supreme Court petition.
Antifa: The Paramilitary Vanguard of the Cold Civil War
Tax-exempt charitable foundations funnel their support for Antifa radicals through a maze of middlemen and misdirection.
Does the Constitution Still Matter?
Our Constitution is brilliant on paper, but betrayed in practice by the very guardians meant to defend it.
Rogue Judges Undermine the Rule of Law
The gravest threat to our constitutional system comes from ultra-liberal judges with both the will and the power to destroy it from within.