What ‘Diversity Is Our Strength’ Really Means
Editor's Note
In recent years, Western democracies have been sliding into soft totalitarianism just as massive waves of immigrants wash over their borders. Peachy Keenan notices the unsettling connection between these two developments, as more migrants lead to more disorder, and more disorder justifies more control, and more control is used to push more migrants on a battered population. This vicious cycle creates societies at once less stable and less free, and — though making use of external forces — serves as one of the chief lanes of attack on the republican way of life by the enemy within.
Over in the multicultural paradise of Paris, France, the City of Lights just pulled the plug on their magnificent public holiday celebration. For the first time in its 60-year history, the New Year concert on the Champs Elysees has been canceled over fears of “violence.” This year, the party’s over. “The massive midnight concert that drew a jubilant crowd of a million people last year…has been scrapped and replaced by a pre-recorded video to be viewed in the safety and comfort of French living rooms.”
The iconic avenue will be closed off to would-be terrorists that evening instead.
Is President Macron worried about the “far-right” French rising up on Christmas? Is that pesky Marine le Pen and her Front Nationale party of “right wing extremists” drawing up evil plans to drive cars through crowds of pedestrians on New Year’s Eve?
It turns out that the threat to Paris is coming from its greatest strength: its diversity. This is, of course, the same diversity that brought you the Bataclan music concert massacre in 2015, the Charlie Hebdo office massacre that same year, and the Nice truck terror attack that killed 86 people in 2016.
Eighty-six people! In response, the French promptly cracked down on the far-right political groups who protested mass immigration. For good measure, they redoubled their efforts to increase France’s diversity. Roughly 347,000 immigrants arrived in France in 2023, up from a mere 259,000 in 2016. In 2016, eight million people in France (11% of the population) were foreign-born immigrants. As of 2025, 9.2 million people in France are foreign-born — a shocking 14% of the country.
Terrorist massacres inflicted on innocent civilians work better than any UN decree to increase foreign immigration into fragile European societies. The suicidal impulse of these nations is so strong that, based on the numbers, the more terror a foreign national inflicts on a Western nation, the more likely it is that that Western nation will roll out the red carpet for immigrants from that terrorist’s homeland.
Last weekend, some more muscular diversity was visited upon a group of Jewish families enjoying a Hanukkah gathering on Bondi Beach in Australia. A father-son duo from Pakistan fired bolt-action rifles for nearly 20 minutes unmolested, killing fifteen, as a few 22-year-old female police officers cowered helplessly just a few feet from them. (When it comes to the strength of diversity, ethnic and religious diversity will always beat Western attempts at gender diversity.)
The younger of the Aussie gunmen “was previously investigated in 2019 for possible terror ties by the Australian Security Intelligence Organization (ASIO).” He was a native-born citizen; his father was a Pakistani national on a resident visa.
In other words, fifteen deaths could have been easily prevented if some basic national hygiene had been practiced. Almost all foreign terror attacks are optional; they are a risk Western nations have agreed to undertake to reach maximum diversity. The Australian Jews killed on Sunday would all be alive today if any of the safety nets a sane nation would have in place had not been torn down. One: don’t allow mass migration from terror hotspots like Pakistan. Two: don’t allow people with ideologies incompatible to liberal Western democracies to step foot in your country.
Yes, you can Just Say No to showering visas on populations riddled with Jew-hatred, Christian-hatred, rampant child sexual abuse, and total disregard for women as people.
Three: if anyone is suspected of getting radicalized at some “Islamic Center,” they get deported; better safe than sorry. Four: you don’t allow “Islamic Centers” in your country where young men are radicalized and taught to hate their host nation. Five: you don’t seize the guns from the law-abiding native-born. If a single Australian man had had a gun that day, fewer people would be dead. The female cops, presumably armed, were frozen and unable to fire their weapons for many long, excruciating minutes.
If Australia cared about Jews, Christians, or any ethnic Australian national, they would immediately begin the process of deporting all radical Muslims and shut down all Islamic “centers.” After years of watching Islam break its way into the West, I think I’m ready to go out on a limb and say this: it just might be a problematic religion! Call me crazy, but no other religion in the world has “places of worship” that turn you into terrorists.
I haven’t even mentioned the ongoing demographic disaster that is the United Kingdom.
For years we have been told that diversity in France and Australia and England and the United States “is our strength.”
No one knew what that meant: until now. When a foreign-born immigrant tells you “diversity is our strength,” that is exactly what they mean: it is their strength, and our colossal weakness. They have found the soft underbelly of the West and they are busy disemboweling it. Each terror attack, each stabbing, each Somali fraud ring stealing billions, each girl raped and murdered by an illegal in the United States, each unlicensed Indian truck driver who slams into a family in their minivan and kills them instantly — each incident is a flex, a demonstration of their strength. They can do whatever they want, because they know no one will stop them.
Pay attention to Europe and Australia: they are where we would be if we didn’t have Donald Trump, free speech, and guns. Cling bitterly to all three, and pray.