The Editors
Tagged Content
Posts
APA Watch Supports Eastman: A Reader’s Guide
APA Watch argues that California’s discipline burdens lawyers and clients, misuses the federal conspiracy statute, and conflicts with federal authority over litigation.
Goldstein and Henry Support Review of Eastman’s Case
Two Pennsylvania election lawyers distinguish their support for Supreme Court review from endorsement of Eastman, arguing that disputed advocacy needs a clear disciplinary standard.
NLPC and Four Attorneys Support Eastman
NLPC and four attorneys argue that allegations of falsity or criminal conduct do not let California bypass the First Amendment standard for speech-based discipline.
America’s Future and Others Support Eastman
Thirteen organizations argue that California’s treatment of election challenges, a disputed federal filing, and political advocacy warrants Supreme Court review.